The Driver Suit Blog-A Crash Course on SFI Ratings

By David G. Firestone

This week, we’re going to do things a little differently. I came across this post from Bartley Motorsports in Rocksprings, Texas, and they were so good in explaining the SFI raiting for driver suits that I had to repost it.  I take no credit fir this post, it all goes to Bartley Motosports.  Thanks to Patrica Bartley for letting me use this!

A Crash Course on SFI Ratings

What is “SFI” and why does it matter to me, as a racer? The SFI Foundation is a non-profit that administers standards for specialty automotive and racing equipment. For the purpose of this article, we’ll focus on “spec 3″ of the ratings as they relate to fire protection materials, driver suits and driver accessories.

3.2 is specifically a technical bulletin on Fire Protection Material while 3.2A is very prescriptive in the requirements to meet ratings such as 3.2A/1, 3.2A/3, 3.2A/5 having to do with “TPP” or Thermal Protective Performance or, how long until you reach a 2nd degree burn. As a realist, I hope we can all agree these are guidelines and not guarantees. One can imagine many circumstances that would influence the effectiveness of a given article and it’s ability to protect against flame. Of note, the 3.2A/10, 3.2A/15, 3.2A/20 ratings for driver suits currently require recertification every 5 years.

3.3 deals with accessories such as arm restraints, footwear, gloves, helmet supports and underclothing to name a few.

How do you know if an article is SFI approved and what it’s rating is? Glad you asked that. Every SFI approved item must carry a tag (normally affixed in a conspicuous location) that has a specific standard layout and will not only show SFI’s logo but it will call out the specification that it meets. It is interesting to note that different manufacturers use different materials to achieve the same ratings. Do your homework before you buy to be sure you are spending those dollars wisely. In addition, always follow the manufacturer’s cleaning instructions as you could easily alter the properties of your gear’s material and have disasterous results if the time came to rely on it. This is not something to take lightly.
null

To give you an idea of the relationship of the SFI rating, to TPP, to ‘time to burn’ we offer the following:

SFI-TPP-Time chart

Race sactioning bodies will specify, in their rules, the minimum requirements to compete at various levels. For most highly competitive / high speed events you should give serious consideration to what your own expectations are as they relate to your safety. Ask yourself if you are prepared for the worst. Stop and think about “what if…”.

It wasn’t long ago we were passing through technical inspection and were told “you don’t need that [safety item] in this class” to which I quickly answered “I will if we flip the car”, which drew an affirming nod from the inspector. Only you can be responsible for you and you must be prepared to deal with the consequences of your decisions. We always exceed the requirements because we consider the “what ifs”. One more comment on that note – I’d rather exceed requirements as I PASS tech, than to fall short and be sitting out the event or scrambling to address the deficiency at the last minute.

When you are planning a first-time purchase or it is time to replace/upgrade, just think as you would when packing a suitcase:

1. Underwear (bottoms)

2. Undershirt (top)

3. Socks

4. Suit (two-piece top/bottom or one-piece driver suit)

5. Shoes

6. Gloves

7. Head protection (head sock (balaclava) and helmet)

6. “other” as required – helmet support, arm restraints, head/neck restraints, harnesses…there is a lot going on as it relates to your safety in competition. READ THE RULES!

Check out our website for pictures, information and pricing of safety equipment.

Thanks again to Patrica Bartley and Bartley Motosports for letting me use this!  Next week, we examine an area of the racing memorabilia market many fans are shocked even exists.

The Driver Suit Blog..The SFI and FIA patches…Why they are as critical as they are.

fia 1By David Firestone

Many race fans have seen these small patches on driver suits, and may have wondered what they are. What many do not realize is that these small patches have a very critical role in driver safety. These small patches are the safety certification patches. These small patches state that this uniform part has been examined by one of the two groups, and determined to meet the standards set by the group. For North American made equipment that group is SFI.

sfiAccording to their website, SFI was founded in 1963 as part of Speed Equipment Manufacturers Association or SEMA, as a safety group. Back then, the safety culture wasn’t as rigorous as it is today, and there were not many standards in place. SEMA started the safety certification with SFI or SEMA Foundation, Inc certification. If the equipment didn’t meet SFI standards, the participant could be denied entrance to the event. Eventually, SFI left SEMA and became its own independent group.

Since then, SFI has certified safety equipment, and their certification is the standard in North America. This small patch is usually sewn into the inside wrist area on the left sleeve. This example, from a Terry Labonte suit from 2008, indicates that the suit meets “3.2A/5” standards. According to their site, this certification is standard for driver suits, and this suit would need re-certification in the next 5 years, or 2013. This certification is standard for many NASCAR suits, as shown below.12-stremme-sfi36-said-sfi

10-labonte-sfi 12-miller-sfiFor suits made internationally, the certification comes from a different group, the FIA Institute. Like SFI, the FIA Institute has the exact same goal, to make sure auto racing is safe, and that the equipment that drivers wear is as safe as possible. Unlike SFI however, FIA certification ends up in one of two places, either on the back of the neck,36-barron-neckor inside the belt,

9-kahne-fiaBoth certifications serve the same purpose and both are mandated in racing today. These certifications also appear on driver gloves,90-stricklingloves-ltagand even helmets, usually on the HANS anchormcdonalds-2 - CopyMoving on to more 2013 paint schemes…

Trevor Bayne #6 Valvoline Ford Mustang Love this scheme! This brings back some fond memories of Mark Martin behind the wheel back in the 1990’s. The color and design scheme are amazing, so it gets an A

Regan Smith #7 Tax Slayer/Hellman’s Chevy Camaro Same as the 5 and 88, so nothing really to say here…

Brad Keselowski #22 Hertz Ford Mustang Only Penske can ruin one of the best color schemes with an awful design. Seriously what is the design on the front? It kills this scheme. Final Grade: D

Travis Pastrana #60 Ford Mustang What the Hell? Did Lisa Frank design this car? I’d love to comment on the color scheme, but just looking at the picture is enough! I didn’t think it was possible to make a scheme worse than the Kyle Bush Sponsafier car, but here we are! Final Grade: F’

By the way, I never thought I would reference Lisa Frank in this blog…

Jamie McMurray #1 Cessna Chevy SS Cessna has figured out the way to a good paint scheme, simple colors and simple design. It works very well and earns an A grade.

Casey Mears #13 Geico Ford Fusion Eww…just eww. The color scheme is dreadfull, and the designs on the side are painful to look at. It passed because of the logo and number design. Final Grade: D-

Kyle Busch #18 Interstate Batteries Toyota Camry Great color scheme, and good basic design, but there is something with this car I find annoying. The driver’s name is on the windshield and above the door, so why is it on the top of the hood? Not just on the top of the hood, but UPSIDE DOWN as well? Seriously? It makes no sense, and takes the final grade down to a B